|
3BM 2014 invitro by Hacker VBI & Buyan
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
popularity : 58% |
|||||||||||||||
alltime top: #11750 |
|
|||||||||||||||
added on the 2014-05-31 15:38:20 by diver  |
||||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
cute. I glad chessboard zoomer works very fine.
but..hey, DYCP looks like paralytic.
but..hey, DYCP looks like paralytic.
ZX-Amiga-a-a-a-a!
neat prod even if the appearence of sonic is a bit weird.
There's no original gfx (all converted), and effects are too simple for custom Z80 hardware with 14 MHz and tiles and sprites and. Why "ZX Spectrum" tag is here? This doesn't run on any ZX Spectrum clone even with external wiring. It runs only on ZX Evo FPGA with "tsconf" in it.
I second that gfx selection is somewhat random and keeps no relation to the music. That's no design. So, overall thumb down.
рупор, ты такой дурачок, что стыдно читать твои посты m(
It really looks like Amiga, if you doesn't mean sound (which is although cool) and it's rules.
to dear Alone_Coder: most of your ATM Turbo demos also "doesn't run on any ZX Spectrum clone even with external wiring", so don't touch your keyboard and keep silence.
to dear Alone_Coder: most of your ATM Turbo demos also "doesn't run on any ZX Spectrum clone even with external wiring", so don't touch your keyboard and keep silence.
предлагаю закидать какашками дему подкаблучника после Бухенвальта.
crap
ah, i forgot to say: fonts suck :-)
это не ZX.
Hey, admin of the pouet! Add to demomachines two ths: ZX-Evo and Apogey BK.
Now making a lot of demos for this.
For Alone and others: (ATM & TS-Conf)<>ZX-Spectrum. It is ZX-Evo.
Now making a lot of demos for this.
For Alone and others: (ATM & TS-Conf)<>ZX-Spectrum. It is ZX-Evo.
ATM - Specrtum
Прикольно, чо.
Nice invitro! Tnx! YouTube HD
Guys, you ROCK!!!
Here is the lossless video h264, 720x576, 50fps.
No Spectrum! Obman!
Nice music, appreciate an effort for a young platform. Graphics are dull, there is no style.
Congratulations! Nice prod!
ok
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice!
Since I somehow got mentions in credits, just a piggie (it is way too oldschool for me to thumb this up anyway :) ). So I'd like to use this opportunity to say a few words about the hardware.
In 2009 a new FPGA-based ZX Spectrum clone was created by NedoPC. Their primary goal was to re-create an improved and upgraded version of the 1990s soviet ZX Spectrum clone ATM2. However, an alternative configuration was recently created, with very little regard for hardware solutions from the 1990s and many features not available on the original ZX Spectrum hardware: 14MHz CPU clock, up to 4Mb of memory, flexible memory paging (graphics screens included), 16 and 256 colour modes, extended palettes support, 85 sprites, 2 layers of tiles, DMA, reconfigurable frame and scanline interrupts etc etc. So, although it is a ZX Spectrum compatible computer, a more reasonable comparison for this computer could be the v6z80p, which was used for Loopback by Altair.
In 2009 a new FPGA-based ZX Spectrum clone was created by NedoPC. Their primary goal was to re-create an improved and upgraded version of the 1990s soviet ZX Spectrum clone ATM2. However, an alternative configuration was recently created, with very little regard for hardware solutions from the 1990s and many features not available on the original ZX Spectrum hardware: 14MHz CPU clock, up to 4Mb of memory, flexible memory paging (graphics screens included), 16 and 256 colour modes, extended palettes support, 85 sprites, 2 layers of tiles, DMA, reconfigurable frame and scanline interrupts etc etc. So, although it is a ZX Spectrum compatible computer, a more reasonable comparison for this computer could be the v6z80p, which was used for Loopback by Altair.
introspec, how can you speak what was the primary goal of the clone WE've made? Not you, you see? And even not Alone Coder, but WE. That is, CHRV, savelij, DDp, me. Do you have any proofs of your statement (irc logs do not count)?
Then, your story of 'alternative configuration' is HIGHLY biased. One can think that base configuration does not have 14mhz clock, 4mb (not up to!) of RAM memory, flexible paging etc., which is simply not true. Your bias is of course understandable, but as a mathematician, you could try to be unbiased.
And at last, everything regarding the prod. The only real effect I've found is checkerboard rotator, which seemingly runs at 25fps. Same effect (drawing every second line) is for sure runs at 50fps in 128k (6912), and most probably in 48k at 3.5MHz. Here, given 14MHz cpu, vbi managed to achieve only 25fps. Other stuff is just piles of alien hardware giving overlays over overlays over 6912 screen, much like one project of 90ties by Veremeenko, where alien (regarding ZX) NES gfx was an overlay over 6912 ZX screen (http://trd.speccy.cz/book/REVU95_6.ZIP). Of course I could be wrong hypothesizing that checkerboard effect runs on 6912 screen, but hey, there is even no normal docs for those piles of alien hardware.
Of course, high coding skills are required to move hardware tile planes over the screen and even more perfect skills are needed to move hardware sprites over sine trajectories. Respect for such high coding standards set by this prod. :)
Then, your story of 'alternative configuration' is HIGHLY biased. One can think that base configuration does not have 14mhz clock, 4mb (not up to!) of RAM memory, flexible paging etc., which is simply not true. Your bias is of course understandable, but as a mathematician, you could try to be unbiased.
And at last, everything regarding the prod. The only real effect I've found is checkerboard rotator, which seemingly runs at 25fps. Same effect (drawing every second line) is for sure runs at 50fps in 128k (6912), and most probably in 48k at 3.5MHz. Here, given 14MHz cpu, vbi managed to achieve only 25fps. Other stuff is just piles of alien hardware giving overlays over overlays over 6912 screen, much like one project of 90ties by Veremeenko, where alien (regarding ZX) NES gfx was an overlay over 6912 ZX screen (http://trd.speccy.cz/book/REVU95_6.ZIP). Of course I could be wrong hypothesizing that checkerboard effect runs on 6912 screen, but hey, there is even no normal docs for those piles of alien hardware.
Of course, high coding skills are required to move hardware tile planes over the screen and even more perfect skills are needed to move hardware sprites over sine trajectories. Respect for such high coding standards set by this prod. :)
lvd, I tried hard to be objective. There was no reason to describe here what BaseConfig is (and I did not try to downplay its capacity either). And it is not my fault that I repeated few statements reiterated on numerous occasions on the zx-pk forum by NedoPC members you are friends with.
My point is, this prod is not a ZX Spectrum prod. I explained in what sense it is not a ZX Spectrum prod to the best of my ability. I have no interest in your petty war.
My point is, this prod is not a ZX Spectrum prod. I explained in what sense it is not a ZX Spectrum prod to the best of my ability. I have no interest in your petty war.
After looking at party voting logs, I have to do just this.
I love your platform wars. Keep up the good work in the platform purism section.
I can not understand feelings (i.e. butthurts) of lvd-ish guys apart from their jaundice that someone made it whereas they push their dead parrot.
I strongly disagree to name TS-Conf a ZX. It is not ZX as well as any other add-ons to 128kB, 6912, 3.5MHz are not. It is a backward compatible ZX clone aimed to handsel this platform. Who likes it - uses it. Who envies - shits bricks.
I strongly disagree to name TS-Conf a ZX. It is not ZX as well as any other add-ons to 128kB, 6912, 3.5MHz are not. It is a backward compatible ZX clone aimed to handsel this platform. Who likes it - uses it. Who envies - shits bricks.
But since [ur=http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=62375l]this[/url] is categorized to ZX, TS-Conf prods are also eligible to be in "ZX" section.
what is words what lvdpecker like:
any additional info/results for artfield 2014 available?
the only thing i can find is http://speccy-live.untergrund.net/2014/06/artfield-2014-official-results/, but it carries only the gfx compo results.
@dipswitch, pretty much all information is available here: http://demoscene.multimatograf.ru/af2014 (although not in an easy format for importing). ArtField tends to be an event purely for graphicians; they do ask for demos too, but they do not get them very often.
thx! since the orgas didn't bother to upload the stuff to scene.org, i'm grabbing it.
http://ww.crossfpc.com/view_demo.php?id=8012
Also, this is clearly not a demo but an invite, it's even is the name! ;)
Selfvoting, as expected from such people.
love the last pic
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !
Good work guys and thank you for invitation!